We can all relate to it. Even James Olthuis himself as an adolescent has, in all likelihood, pondered the meaning of his existence in this world. Moreover, he has probably wondered what meaning and purpose life holds, if any individual can but leave only a smudge in the history of the universe. Most of us have experienced such confusion, but more importantly, the relief that showers us when we place our faith and belief in a variety of options. May it be a deity, an occupation or in family- We finally sort our individual priorities based on our perceptions of reality. These perceptions, Olthuis believes, are a sort of lens through which we view the world in order to act and make intelligent decisions. This is our worldview.
Olthuis says our worldview is shaped by and deeply rooted in a myriad of factors: our childhood, faith, traditions in culture, socioeconomic position, emotional experiences, intellectual development, temperament, etc. As we perceive and understand reality within our own mindset, we are shaped and moulded to make certain judgements about the many things in reality. This perception of the world may include a “foundational” set of morals for us, truths, a vague idea of what is acceptable or unacceptable within the boundaries of our culture. In Olthuis’ words, it “tells us what is and is not, but also what ought or ought not to be the case.” It is a vision of life, yet a vision also for life. Reciprocally, these same judgements allows us to form conclusions about reality, ones that are our own. These beliefs give us direction and purpose in life. It then should not come as a surprise that these worldviews and cultures vary quite widely between countries, cultures, neighbors. Differences in people come down to differences in ideas.
Often, these pre-made judgements can hinder our path to truth and understanding. Conflicts arise because of a lack of understanding between two parties. We are generally very protective of the things in which we have rooted our worldview. If our faith, traditions, or values were under attack, our worldview may be broken down or abandoned. Whole societies, as Olthuis believes, could collapse with the fallen worldview. However, worldview is not a static unwavering pillar that gets in the way. Olthuis explains that because of the acquired nature of worldviews, they are meant to be ever-evolving and meant to allow the individual to reflect upon the situation at hand. He reminds us of the reciprocity between worldview and all the factors that have shaped it. Room for a change in worldview translates into an increase in awareness of oneself and ones’ beliefs, which progresses to a change in feelings and actions. At many times, the individual will realize that there is some truth within another's worldview. Though Olthuis says this will cause some tension, the most natural response is rationalize and slightly change one's worldview to allow this new truth to fit in with the rest. This allows individuals to mature, and for societies to develop and advance.
A penny for your thoughts?
- Have you been in a situation where you had to reassess your worldview and possibly realize that it may be lacking in some areas?
- In his article, Olthuis talks about working towards a "new harmony". We can only assume he might be referring to a future society where the boundaries of conflicting worldviews may be alleviated. Realistically, how might this be achieved without the danger of creating a civilization where people are made to do and think the same things?
No comments:
Post a Comment